Pragmatic Carbon Accounting Alliance
Pragmatic Carbon Accounting Alliance
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • HOW TO JOIN
  • FAQS
  • RESOURCES
  • CONTACT
  • More
    • HOME
    • ABOUT
    • HOW TO JOIN
    • FAQS
    • RESOURCES
    • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • HOW TO JOIN
  • FAQS
  • RESOURCES
  • CONTACT

Resources

What's Wrong with Mandatory 24/7?

What's Wrong with Mandatory 24/7?

What's Wrong with Mandatory 24/7?

CEBA Calls for Immediate Changes to Scope 2 Revision Process


This article advocates for a change in the GHGP Scope 2 revision process, arguing that hourly matching is "inefficient and infeasible for most buyers and may curtail ambitious global climate action."


GHG Management Institute: Limitations of Hourly Matching Claims


Hourly matching sounds rigorous, but key technical and market flaws make it insufficient as a standalone solution for Scope 2 reporting. (Related: Ever.Green FAQ)


Expert Consensus on Climate Impact


More than 30 academics and experts agree that hourly matching sounds good on paper but falls short in practice.

Alternatives to Mandatory Scope 2

What's Wrong with Mandatory 24/7?

What's Wrong with Mandatory 24/7?

McKinsey: Rethinking Your Company's Clean-Power Strategy


This article analyzes how hourly matching, while well-intentioned, can degrade "grid citizenship" as individual-level accounting incentives conflict with system-level needs.


Baringa: The Corporate Catalyst


This study illustrates why relaxing market boundaries for voluntary procurement - rather than tightening them - offers the greatest opportunity for climate impact.


Jigar Shah: Voluntary Markets, The Key to Unlocking More Clean Energy


While voluntary 24/7 commitments should be applauded, mandatory hourly matching poses a significant risk to the impact of voluntary markets. Learn more in this LinkedIn post, authored by Latitude Media's Jigar Shah.

GHGP Scope 2 Guidance Interview Series

Scope 2 Revision Priorities: Integrity, Impact, Feasibility

The Goals of the Scope 2 Revision Process

It’s time for a revision to Scope 2 guidance. Those on all sides agree that the focus should be on integrity — the accuracy of the accounting measures; impact — how these accounting measures lead to the intended goal of more CFE; and feasibility — the reality of what it takes to implement projects around the world.

The Options Under Review

Mandatory load-matched 24/7 CFE argues that the easiest way to ensure integrity of projects is to add location into the accounting. The theory is that accountability is a lot easier when the project is just down the road.


However, a project doesn’t need to be in sight to be accounted for accurately. In fact, due to the complexity of modern grids, projects close by might not be any easier to account for!


If the world’s focus is on the most accurate accounting that will catalyze action towards more clean energy procurement — a focus on actionability is key. A model that leans towards flexibility will ensure feasibility, can incorporate integrity, and will most definitely lead to more impact.

Contact Us to Learn More

Pragmatic Carbon Accounting Alliance

Copyright © 2025 Pragmatic Carbon Accounting Alliance - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept